The Government of British Columbia refused to fund this road for a decade, refused it
the designation that would have protected it, and now says it is too dangerous to keep.
The excavators are booked for this month. The public was never asked.
Rady Creek is a single-lane road that leaves Highway 31 east of Trout Lake and climbs. In under an hour it lifts you from the valley floor to fifteen hundred metres of alpine on Silvercup Ridge. There is nothing else like it in the Kootenays.
Miners cut the first grade here more than a century ago to reach the Silver Cup mine, which pulled roughly a million and a half ounces of silver out of this mountain between 1895 and 1915. The ore ran out and the town emptied — a thousand people in 1897, seven by 1959. The road stayed, and people kept using it.
Today it carries dirt bikes, ATVs, mountain bikers, hikers and horseback riders through the summer. In winter it is the primary safe route into the riding area locals call Foggy Day. It reaches some of the oldest active mineral claims in the province. And it serves what is left of Trout Lake — a community whose three remaining industries are tourism, mineral exploration and recreation. All three go up this road.
It is also the middle of only three ways onto Silvercup Ridge. An old miner-built pack trail runs the length of that ridge. Take out the centre access and anyone in trouble up there has to reach one of the far ends, or wait for a helicopter.
In November 2020 the Auditor General of British Columbia audited how the Province manages its forest service roads. The conclusion was that the Ministry was not maintaining them to its own policies — and the audit explains exactly why.
Every year the natural resource districts — the people on the ground who inspect these roads and know what they need — submit maintenance budget requests. Every year the Engineering Branch funds a sliver of them.
Then narrow it to this region. The South Area, which contains the Selkirk district and Trout Lake, asked for $4.5 million for its priority roads in 2019/20 and received $1.7 million. The single largest slice of what it asked for was recreation access.
The record-keeping was worse than the money. Of eight districts the auditors sampled, seven kept no historical inspection data. Two kept no maintenance records at all. An internal ministry audit had found the same failures in 2008 — twelve years earlier. Nothing had changed in between.
The deterioration the Ministry now cites as grounds for destroying this road is the direct, predictable result of a decade of its own funding decisions. It defunded the road, kept no record of the consequences, and is presenting those consequences as an act of nature.
The Ministry's funding policy ranks maintenance money in three tiers. First, roads serving communities of fifty or more year-round residents. Second, roads serving rural residences. Third — and this is the one that matters — high-value recreation sites, as designated by the Recreation Sites and Trails BC representative.
Roads that clear any tier become what the Ministry calls capital roads. The Auditor General describes capital roads as unlikely to be deactivated, and as requiring continual maintenance. About twelve thousand kilometres of road in this province carry that protection.
Trout Lake has around two dozen residents. Nobody lives on Rady Creek. Tiers one and two were never available. Tier three was the only door — and it swings on a single administrative decision by a single agency.
In 2017, the Trout Lake Recreational Club went to that exact agency and did everything right. They asked Recreation Sites and Trails BC to make their riding areas official. RSTBC sent a mapping team. The club handed over its list of trails. RSTBC made them trailhead signs — the first of the new-style signs issued anywhere in the province. A member drove to Nelson to collect them and volunteers put them up at a work bee.
Four years later, when the Rady deactivation was circulated for comment, Recreation Sites and Trails BC filed no concern.
The club walked into the one agency that could have saved this road, registered its trails, and was handed signage for its trouble. When it counted, that agency said nothing. A single unrecorded silence — not a hazard, not a budget line, not a caribou — removed the last protection this road had.
The newest reason for removing Rady Creek is that an engineer in the Nelson office has identified it as a landslide hazard requiring removal for public safety.
No terrain stability assessment has been published. No geotechnical report. No hydrology report. The petitioners say none has ever been disclosed to them. The engineer has never been named.
What has been published is the deactivation prescription itself, produced on 7 November 2025 and available to anyone on the Ministry's own website. It lists 79 waypoints across 4,376 metres, each flagged in the field with ribbon and orange paint.
Seventy-five of those waypoints prescribe cross-ditches, fill pull-backs and water bars — work a grader could reverse in a week. Four prescribe full re-contour, which nothing reverses.
And at waypoint 74 — the top of the work, the furthest point the excavators will reach — the Ministry's own surveyor wrote a note that appears on the published map.
A government that will not release its safety evidence has published a map on which its own surveyor recorded that you can drive a pickup to the top of the section it calls too dangerous to keep. And the treatment prescribed for that catastrophic hazard is, at seventy-five of seventy-nine waypoints, a drainage ditch.
The Incomappleux River road sits in the same valley, in the same district, under the same District Manager, on the same timeline. When the Ministry decided to remove that one, this is what it did.
It published a fifteen-question public FAQ with a file number on every page. It mailed notices to landowners and interested parties in 2021, then again in 2023, then again in 2024. It advertised the draft plans in the local paper. It opened a formal public comment period, ran it, closed it, and committed on the record to reviewing every submission before proceeding.
For Rady Creek: none of it. A map and a data file posted to a webpage last November, and a sign on a switchback.
The Trout Lake Recreational Club and Arrow Lakes Ridge Riders argue the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation requires public review and comment, and supporting assessments, before a decision like this. We have found no record that either happened here — and we have asked.
The Ministry cannot argue it did not know what proper consultation looks like. It ran one four kilometres away and documented every step. The difference between these two roads is not procedure. It is that one had residents with property titles, and the other had recreational users with nothing to sue over.
British Columbia keeps a public lobbyist registry. Every registered contact between a lobbyist and a senior public official is filed, dated, numbered and searchable by anyone. It takes ten minutes to learn to use, and nobody in this fight had looked.
Directly behind Silvercup Ridge sits Galena Lodge, operated by Canadian Mountain Holidays, which holds roughly three million hectares of commercial recreation tenure across British Columbia — tenure issued by the Ministry of Forests. The industry association for heli-skiing and cat-skiing is HeliCat Canada, and it retains professional lobbyists.
Those 162 filings are not history. Between December 2025 and July 2026, HeliCat's registered contacts include near-monthly meetings with the Director and a policy specialist of the provincial Wildlife Branch — the officials who run the caribou file that has been used to close this terrain. It reached two deputy ministers repeatedly across May, June and July of this year. It reached the Deputy Minister to the Premier. It reached the Minister of Environment and Parks directly.
In the same period, the people who use Rady Creek wrote letters. Steve Shannon's petition, which he believes passed ten thousand signatures, went to the Minister of Forests and got nothing back. When seventy people gathered at Trout Lake in July and invited the Ministry, it sent natural resource officers — who told the crowd they were not permitted past the barricade.
Access to public land in this province is being decided in rooms that recreational users have never been in. One industry association has more registered meetings with this government in thirteen months than every motorised recreation group in British Columbia has had in a decade. That is not a coincidence of scale. It is what a closed process produces.
The Province withheld maintenance funding from this class of road for a decade and kept no records of what that did. It refused the road the recreation designation that would have restored the funding — after the community had done everything the agency asked of it. It then produced an unpublished safety opinion to justify removal, on a road where its own surveyor noted a pickup can be driven to the top. It skipped the consultation process it had just run, in full, four kilometres away. And through all of it, the commercial operator behind the same ridge sat in monthly meetings with the deputy ministers and wildlife officials making these calls, while the people who use this road could not get a reply to a ten-thousand-signature petition.
The Auditor General was clear that none of this was required. There is no trigger for deactivation. There is no timeline. A forest service road can stay exactly where it is, indefinitely, if someone pays to maintain it. Removal is not an obligation. It is a decision — and it can be unmade this week by one instruction from the Minister's office.
Rady Creek is one road. But the mechanism that condemned it — no transition pathway, no designation, no consultation, no record — is standard operating procedure for public access across British Columbia.
In this district alone, four more roads are already in the queue. There is no process anywhere in the province for turning a retired industrial road into a managed recreation route. The only tool the Ministry has is the excavator.
The pattern will not stop at Trout Lake unless it is stopped at Trout Lake.
In August 2026 Tyler at LetsGetLost spent two days on this road and in Trout Lake,
checking the government's four stated reasons against what residents, prospectors and
club members told him — and against records obtained under freedom of information.
What the Ministry has said, and what the film found when it checked.
An engineer identified the road as a landslide hazard. The film drove the full length looking for evidence and found no major washouts, no obvious slope failures, no compromised sections.
“A convenient lie.”Thomas Gardner · Taranis ResourcesReport never released
wilderness first responder
The Ministry cites a lack of maintenance funding. The Auditor General confirms the shortfall is real — and that it was a provincial allocation decision, not a local one.
Districts received 14% of what they asked for.Auditor General of BC · 2019/20Verified — Auditor General
The road sits inside a Government Actions Regulation area for the Central Selkirk herd. The film notes that while terrain closed for caribou, the Ministry approved new cut blocks in the same habitat.
“That’s not the deal we made.”Trout Lake Recreational ClubCut block figure unverified
on the 2021 stewardship agreement
Once industrial use ends, the road is surplus. The film sets this against the mineral tenures, Crown Grants and year-round public use that still depend on the corridor.
“There’s people up there right now.”Interviewed on the road, August 2026Verified — Ministry policy
Raised by the film, by residents, and by the documents themselves.
The film's central finding. Freedom of information records and interviews show four rationales in circulation at once — safety, money, caribou, end of forestry — with which one you hear depending on which official you reach.
“Three or four different excuses. None of them worked.”Trout Lake residentConsistent with the record
In 2017 the Trout Lake club mapped and registered its riding areas with Recreation Sites and Trails BC and handed over a list of trails. Members say those trails were then deactivated one by one, and that a Ministry letter records RSTBC raising no concern about Rady.
“They decided it wasn’t a high recreation value place. We just weren’t important.”Trout Lake Recreational ClubRecords requested
Interviewees raise the province's commitment to conserve 30% of British Columbia by 2030, and argue a shift of that scale should not proceed without consultation. One traces his family to the Highland Clearances and sees the same instrument at work.
“Another stroke of the pen, displacing the people who made their lives here.”Thomas Gardner · Taranis ResourcesInterviewee argument
A conservancy limits what tenure holders can do while they still owe annual work commitments. Without road access, holders eventually surrender their claims — and a government that later wants the land no longer has anyone to expropriate or compensate.
Give up the claim, and there is nobody left to compensate.The film's summary of the mechanismInterviewee argument
Records obtained under freedom of information show an operator's representative raising the cost of added stewardship obligations, and identifying growing unmanaged public recreation as a problem for the business.
The filmmaker says plainly he found no evidence linking this to the Rady decision.Stated on camera, August 2026Stated as an open question
Historic workings across this area have never been properly remediated. Removing the road removes the only way to get equipment in.
“You can’t say you’re protecting the environment while leaving toxic mine sites to leach into the streams.”Interviewed in the filmInterviewee argument
Every entry is sourced. The full document register and outstanding records requests are at the foot of this page.
Deactivation is not decided in Victoria. Under the Forest and Range Practices Act it belongs to one official at the district level — and it can be paused from above.
This is the gap underneath everything on this page. When a Forest Service Road stops being needed for logging, British Columbia has exactly one tool for it: deactivation. There is no mechanism to hand that same corridor to Recreation Sites and Trails BC and keep it open as a managed recreation route.
Not a slow mechanism. Not an underfunded one. None. The Ministry of Forests cannot transfer a road footprint into the recreation system, because no pathway to do it has ever been built.
So when the industrial use ends, the only question a district can answer is how much of the road to destroy. And the Ministry told the Trout Lake club exactly what that means in practice: the road must be deactivated first — the slope returned to its pre-road condition — after which the club is welcome to apply for a permit and rebuild access over the same ground.
The BC Snowmobile Federation has put a four-point proposal in front of the Minister of Forests. It is not a demand to keep every road open forever. It is a request to build the missing pathway, and to use Rady Creek to build it.
The four-point proposal the BC Snowmobile Federation put to the Minister of Forests on 6 July 2026.
Halt physical work at Rady Creek long enough for a formal cross-ministry transition review — Forests, Environment and Parks, Recreation Sites and Trails BC, local representatives and recreation partners at the same table.
Use a temporary wilderness road designation to hold the corridor legally stable while a permanent transfer framework is built. This is the mechanism MLA Scott McInnis has asked the Legislature to apply.
This corridor has no bridges and no large culverts — the lowest-risk footprint in the province on which to design a standardised transition tool. Build the pathway here, then apply it everywhere.
The Federation and the Trout Lake club have offered to fund an independent geotechnical assessment themselves, removing the cost and the administrative burden from the Ministry entirely.
The road sits with the Ministry of Forests. The recreation designation sits with Environment and Parks. Neither ministry has authority to complete a transfer on its own, and no process compels them to sit down together.
Even a road that clears the recreation designation enters a funding pool that met 14% of district requests in 2019/20. A pathway with no budget behind it moves roads from one queue into another.
The Province holds the risk until it deactivates. Clubs have offered to assume liability and carry insurance — but there is no instrument to accept that offer, so the safest administrative act remains destruction.
Rady Creek is not an outlier. It is the front of a queue — and every road behind it will be resolved the same way, for the same reason, unless the pathway gets built.
In the Selkirk district alone, four more roads are already posted or under way. One of them, Heights FSR, carries an explicit note in the Ministry's own listing: there will be no ATV access after completion.
Province-wide the arithmetic is worse. Roughly 58,000 kilometres of Forest Service Road exist; around 12,000 carry the capital status that makes them unlikely to be deactivated. The rest sit at the wilderness minimum, and the wilderness minimum does not guarantee that a vehicle can get through.
This is how an adventure tourism economy gets hollowed out. Not by a single decision anyone would defend in public, but by a hundred district-level decisions taken quietly, each one individually reasonable under a policy that offers no alternative. The operators, guides, lodges, fuel stops and repair shops that depend on backcountry access do not lose it in one announcement. They lose one road a year until the trip is no longer worth taking.
Trout Lake has around two dozen residents and three remaining industries — tourism, mineral exploration and recreation. All three run up this road. Communities like it do not recover access once the bench is gone; they simply stop being places people drive to.
Pause Rady Creek. Build the transition pathway here, on the lowest-risk road in the province, and attach real money to it. Then apply it to the four roads already queued behind this one — and to the thousands of kilometres that will reach the same decision point over the next decade.
The district page still lists it under upcoming works. A pause is an administrative decision that can be made this week. Here is how to force the question.
Ask for an immediate pause and the release of the safety evidence. Pre-written, addressed to the Minister of Forests, copied to Environment, the local MLA and the district office.
Open the emailThe Trout Lake Recreational Club and Arrow Lakes Ridge Riders are demanding a pause and a legal review of how this decision was made.
Sign at Change.orgPhotographs from any year. Dates you used the road. Correspondence with the Ministry. Permits, maps, records of maintenance requests. If you were up there, that is evidence.
Submit evidenceWas a public comment period held for Rady Creek FSR 0321.02, and where is it published? Ask in writing so there is a record, and forward whatever comes back to us.
Email the district officeExcavators cut drainage trenches across the road, pull the fill back off the outside edge, and at certain points re-contour the slope to its natural angle. The published prescription for Rady lists 79 waypoints across 4,376 metres. Seventy-five are ditches and pull-backs, which a grader could undo. Four prescribe full re-contour, which nothing undoes.
It also ends the Ministry's obligation to maintain the road and returns the ground to vacant Crown land.
The Ministry says so and will not show its work. No terrain stability assessment, geotechnical report or hydrology report has been published, and the petitioners say none has been disclosed to them.
What is published is the Ministry's own prescription map, on which its surveyor recorded that a pickup can be driven to the top of the work area. A government that believed it had a landslide on its hands would release the report. This one has had five years.
The Central Selkirk herd is genuinely at risk and that deserves to be taken seriously. But caribou is one of four reasons the Ministry has given for Rady, alongside safety, funding and the end of logging — and which one you hear depends on who you ask.
The clubs signed a caribou stewardship agreement in March 2021 and learned a month later, from a third party, that the road was going. Meanwhile the commercial heli-ski operation flying the same terrain has faced no equivalent restriction — only a request for its flight data, which its industry association resisted.
No. The Auditor General of British Columbia found in November 2020 that there is no trigger and no timeline for deactivation, and that Forest Service Roads can remain open indefinitely if maintained as wilderness roads — the minimum standard applied to every such road in the province.
The Ministry must maintain a road until it deactivates it. Deactivation is the escape hatch that opens when the maintenance money is gone.
Because it is the whole game. The funding policy ranks maintenance money in three tiers, and the third is high-value recreation sites as designated by the Recreation Sites and Trails BC representative. Roads that clear a tier become capital roads, which the Auditor General describes as unlikely to be deactivated and requiring continual maintenance.
Nobody lives on Rady Creek, so tiers one and two were closed. The recreation tier was the only door — and RSTBC filed no concern when the deactivation was circulated.
We have found no record of one — nothing on the district page, nothing in the coalition's material, nothing in any source we have reviewed. We have asked the Ministry directly and filed for the records. Whatever comes back will be published here.
What is not in doubt is the comparison. The same district, in the same years, ran a documented public process for the Incomappleux road four kilometres away.
Silvercup Ridge drops to two access routes, both at the far ends. Anyone in difficulty up there reaches one of those ends or waits for a helicopter. Mineral tenure and Crown Grant holders lose vehicle access to claims they have spent decades proving up. The winter route into Foggy Day is gone. Trout Lake loses the road all three of its remaining industries depend on.
The Trout Lake club has offered to take the corridor on — assume the liability, carry the insurance, manage it. The Ministry's answer was that the road must be destroyed first, after which the club is welcome to apply for a permit and rebuild it.
Please do. The Auditor General's report is at bcauditor.com. The prescription map and district road page are on gov.bc.ca. The lobbyist registry is at lobbyistsregistrar.bc.ca — free, searchable, and every figure cited here carries an activity number.
If you find an error, tell us. We will correct it and log the correction in the open.
This file grows. Every addition, correction and withdrawal is dated and sourced here — including our own mistakes.
Everything on this page rests on a government document, a public registry entry, a named news organisation, or an organisation's own published statement. Where an account comes from an interview rather than a record, we say so in the source line.
We publish the conclusions the evidence supports and we name the documents that would settle what it does not. When a record arrives that changes something here, we change it and log it.
SaveRady.com is published by the Backcountry Coalition — a non-profit working on public land use issues that affect recreational users.
The Coalition was founded in British Columbia and works alongside established groups including the BC Snowmobile Federation, ATVBC, the Four Wheel Drive Association of BC and the Trout Lake Recreational Club. It is not a substitute for any of them. It exists to do the work volunteer boards rarely have capacity for: pulling public records, filing information requests, and publishing what the documents show.
Rady Creek is our first file. It will not be our last.